Naval's ranking puts labor last, and services work flips it. The constraint I keep hitting is narrower: one smart operator only scales a team once her judgment is written down where the rest of the team can run it without her.
"Nothing will replace competent people. Not AI, not automations, and not working harder." That's the lesson that takes longest to learn. The personal brand point connects to it, too: a brand built over years is what draws competent people to you, because they can see what you stand for before they ever meet you. Credibility times visibility times consistency equals opportunity, and consistency is the part most people drop.
Naval's ranking puts labor last, and services work flips it. The constraint I keep hitting is narrower: one smart operator only scales a team once her judgment is written down where the rest of the team can run it without her.
"Nothing will replace competent people. Not AI, not automations, and not working harder." That's the lesson that takes longest to learn. The personal brand point connects to it, too: a brand built over years is what draws competent people to you, because they can see what you stand for before they ever meet you. Credibility times visibility times consistency equals opportunity, and consistency is the part most people drop.
AI isn't replacing humans. It's making the good ones better.
And making the bad ones worse lol